TV shows have a unique advantage that movies simply can’t match: time. Unlike film, television provides creators with the luxury of slowly peeling back the layers of a character, allowing for development that feels remarkably authentic. Characters aren’t just plot devices—they’re living, breathing entities that grow before our eyes.
With extended storylines, TV characters can undergo transformations that mirror real human experiences. Viewers become invested as these characters learn, stumble, and evolve over months and even years. They’re compelling precisely because they reflect our own messy journey of personal growth—imperfect, unpredictable, and wonderfully complex.
Of course, not every show gets character development right. Some series drag on far too long, turning once-vibrant characters into pale shadows of their original selves. We’ve all watched shows where brilliant character potential gets lost in repetitive plot lines and diminishing creative vision.
Television approaches character development in wildly different ways. Some shows focus on deep personal transformation, others explore redemption narratives, while some fall into the trap of recycling tired character stereotypes. The most memorable characters strike a delicate balance: they surprise us while remaining fundamentally true to themselves.
Effective character development is part art, part science. Writers need to walk the fine line between pushing character growth to its limits while remaining faithful to who a character fundamentally is. It requires a nuanced understanding of human nature, narrative pacing, and the subtle art of keeping audiences engaged.
When done effectively, character development can elevate a good show to something truly extraordinary. And when they miss the mark, well… you’re left wishing they’d wrapped up a season earlier.
Flanderization: The Curse of Overstretched Characters
Ever noticed how some TV characters start off as nuanced individuals, only to devolve into one-note stereotypes? This phenomenon is called ‘Flanderization’ – named after Ned Flanders from The Simpsons, a character who began as a genuinely complex neighbor and gradually became a caricature of piousness and religious fervor.
What starts as an idiosyncrasy or even an endearing characteristic, can quickly turn into a character’s entire personality. It’s the narrative equivalent of beating a joke until it’s not only dead, but thoroughly pulverized.
And it’s not a fluke—it’s practically a rite of passage for long-running television series. Think Joey from Friends, who went from a lovable doofus to just a straight up doofus as the series progressed. Or Tobias from Arrested Development, whose closeted homosexuality became the character’s only punchline.
The Office provides a masterclass in character overexposure. Those delightful side characters who once had subtle, nuanced personalities gradually became walking collections of their most exaggerated traits. (As a big fan of The Office, I will probably write a whole separate blog post on this subject later.)
The real tragedy of Flanderization isn’t just bad writing—it’s wasted potential. Characters need room to breathe, evolve, and occasionally defy expectations. When they become nothing more than a collection of recycled jokes and predictable reactions, that’s when audiences start reaching for the remote.
Personal Growth and Redemption: Positive Evolutions
When television gets character development right, it’s nothing short of narrative magic. We’re talking about characters who change, grow, and sometimes even find redemption.
Take Suzanne (Crazy Eyes) from Orange is the New Black. Initially introduced through her unpredictable behavior, the series gradually reveals her profound sensitivity by exploring her challenging childhood, mental health struggles, and desperate need for genuine connection. Suzanne becomes a powerful example of character development that refuses to simplify mental health and emotional complexity.
Adam from Girls provides another fascinating case study. Initially appearing as an erratic, somewhat problematic love interest, he gradually reveals himself as a character wrestling with genuine emotional depth. His journey isn’t a smooth, predictable path, but a messy, authentic exploration of personal growth. Viewers watch him stumble, fail, and incrementally become a more self-aware individual—much like actual human beings tend to do.
The Roses from Schitt’s Creek offer a masterclass in family transformation. What begins as a collection of self-absorbed, wealthy caricatures gradually becomes a deeply connected, genuinely loving family. Their growth feels organic and earned, never contrived. Each character’s development is a delicate balance of maintaining their core personality while allowing genuine change to occur.
The secret to great character development isn’t complicated: it’s honesty. These characters resonate because they reflect the complex, often contradictory nature of human experience. They grow not because the plot demands it, but because their experiences genuinely shape them. We see echoes of our own struggles, our own potential for change, reflected in their journeys.
Descent into Darkness: When Characters Become Antiheroes
Some characters take a darker turn, descending into moral chaos. Let’s discuss everyone’s favorite anti hero: Walter White from Breaking Bad. He’s first introduced as a “good guy”, a mild-mannered high school chemistry teacher who’s unfortunately stricken with cancer. His desperate attempt to secure his family’s financial future quickly unravels into a megalomaniacal pursuit of power, with Walter repeatedly lying to himself about his true motivations.
Jimmy McGill’s journey in Better Call Saul offers an equally compelling narrative of moral erosion. Always a charming hustler with a complicated relationship to the truth, Jimmy’s transformation into Saul Goodman isn’t a sudden shift but a gradual, meticulously crafted descent. Each choice chips away at his initial ethical boundaries, revealing how personal justifications can slowly corrode one’s moral foundation.
The brilliance of these characters lies in their human complexity. They’re not simply villains, but nuanced individuals whose darker impulses emerge through a series of rationalizations, personal traumas, and seemingly small compromises. Walter and Jimmy remind us that the line between moral and immoral isn’t a clear boundary, but a blurry landscape we all potentially navigate.
When done right, character development isn’t just storytelling—it’s a profound exploration of what it means to be human. And part of being human is this uncomfortable truth: under the right circumstances, anyone might be capable of surprising—and troubling—transformations.
Out-of-Nowhere Changes: The Perils of Shocking Twists
Daenerys Targaryen from Game of Thrones serves as the ultimate cautionary tale of character development gone spectacularly wrong. For seasons, she’s positioned as a liberator fighting tyranny, freeing slaves and inspiring hope. Yet, in the final season, she abruptly transforms into the very thing she’s been fighting against—a ruthless, city-burning tyrant. The twist wasn’t just shocking; it felt like a betrayal of the character’s meticulously built narrative arc.
Then there’s Andy Bernard from The Office, another prime example of character derailment. Initially a complex figure wrestling with anger issues and deep insecurities, Andy showed promising growth when he became manager. But by Season 9, all that development unraveled. The writers’ struggle to fit Andy into their plot lines, while also accounting for the actor’s absences, meant his character lost coherence. He went from being a work-in-progress to a character that fans struggled to root for.
These narrative U-turns reveal a fundamental truth about storytelling: character evolution must feel organic, not manufactured. Viewers invest emotional currency in a character’s journey, and radical shifts without proper groundwork feel like a narrative betrayal. The most compelling character changes are those that surprise us while simultaneously making perfect sense.
Ultimately, predictability isn’t the enemy; implausibility is. When writers respect their characters’ journeys and the audience’s emotional investment, character changes feel well warranted—even if they’re unexpected.
Conclusion: The Ever-Changing Landscape of TV Character Development
TV character development is a journey all its own, full of twists, turns, and yes, sometimes missteps. When done skillfully, these character journeys can transform fictional individuals from mere plot devices into living, breathing entities that inhabit our collective imagination.
From the pitfalls of flanderization to the electrifying potential of redemption arcs, character evolution is the heartbeat of compelling storytelling. Antiheroes and complex protagonists offer us a nuanced moral landscape, revealing the messy, unpredictable nature of human experience. They challenge us to look beyond simple good-and-evil narratives, inviting deeper understanding of motivation and personal transformation.
But controversial shifts like Daenerys’s sudden tyranny or Andy’s frustrating inconsistencies? They serve as a critical reminders that character development isn’t a free pass for narrative gymnastics. Authenticity matters. The most powerful character arcs mirror life’s fundamental truth: growth is rarely linear. We stumble, we adapt, we change—sometimes dramatically, sometimes incrementally. Great storytelling captures this messy, beautiful process of becoming.
Leave a Reply